<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The YouTube Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/</link>
	<description>No day without thrill and challenge!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randall Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Hi Axel,

The “end of copyright” - another angle is that the internet will ultimately re-shape 100 years of copyright jurisprudence. The notion of copyright as a monopolistic economic right governed by exclusive licensing just doesn’t fly any longer. However, creators need to be rewarded for the fruits of the labour. Rather than trying to limit use and exploitation, copyright owners and creators should embrace the opportunities opened up by the internet; monetising all manner of uses rather than simply trying to limit who can use their copyright as they have done for  the last 100 years.  

Best,

Randall Harper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Axel,</p>
<p>The “end of copyright” - another angle is that the internet will ultimately re-shape 100 years of copyright jurisprudence. The notion of copyright as a monopolistic economic right governed by exclusive licensing just doesn’t fly any longer. However, creators need to be rewarded for the fruits of the labour. Rather than trying to limit use and exploitation, copyright owners and creators should embrace the opportunities opened up by the internet; monetising all manner of uses rather than simply trying to limit who can use their copyright as they have done for  the last 100 years.  </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Randall Harper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basic Thinking Blog &#187; walk the talk</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Basic Thinking Blog &#187; walk the talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] The YouTube Problem, 3. Mai 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The YouTube Problem, 3. Mai 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.176 seconds -->
