<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Axel Schmiegelow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com</link>
	<description>No day without thrill and challenge!</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Reps and Warranties in Venture Capital Deals by sabanas</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2008/08/20/reps-and-warranties-in-venture-capital-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-7137</link>
		<dc:creator>sabanas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/?p=64#comment-7137</guid>
		<description>Best defence is offence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best defence is offence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reps and Warranties in Venture Capital Deals by Thomas Schulze</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2008/08/20/reps-and-warranties-in-venture-capital-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-3169</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Schulze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/?p=64#comment-3169</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the "insights" - Best Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the &#8220;insights&#8221; - Best Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reps and Warranties in Venture Capital Deals by links for 2008-09-07 : ironmonkeyventures.com</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2008/08/20/reps-and-warranties-in-venture-capital-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-09-07 : ironmonkeyventures.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/?p=64#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>[...] Reps and Warranties in Venture Capital Deals at Axel Schmiegelow (tags: venturecapital) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reps and Warranties in Venture Capital Deals at Axel Schmiegelow (tags: venturecapital) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reps and Warranties in Venture Capital Deals by Garantie-Klauseln in Venture Capital Deals &#124; EASN</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2008/08/20/reps-and-warranties-in-venture-capital-deals/comment-page-1/#comment-2931</link>
		<dc:creator>Garantie-Klauseln in Venture Capital Deals &#124; EASN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/?p=64#comment-2931</guid>
		<description>[...] Axel hat in seinem Blog ein paar Gr&#252;nder-Tipps zu VC-Deals ver&#246;ffentlicht. Dabei geht`s insbesondere um Garantien, die sich Investoren manchmal sicher wollen. Axel`s Meinung k&#246;nnt ihr in seinem Blog lesen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Axel hat in seinem Blog ein paar Gr&#252;nder-Tipps zu VC-Deals ver&#246;ffentlicht. Dabei geht`s insbesondere um Garantien, die sich Investoren manchmal sicher wollen. Axel`s Meinung k&#246;nnt ihr in seinem Blog lesen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on sevenload relaunches and secures new round of financing! by Expansion und Internationalisierung von sevenload - sevenload Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2008/07/18/sevenload-relaunches-and-secures-new-round-of-financing/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>Expansion und Internationalisierung von sevenload - sevenload Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/?p=58#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>[...] und das internationale englischsprachige sevenload.com legen wir damit den Grundstein f&#252;r die globale Erweiterung von sevenload. Insbesondere hierf&#252;r suchen wir tatkr&#228;ftige Unterst&#252;tzung mit unseren [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] und das internationale englischsprachige sevenload.com legen wir damit den Grundstein f&#252;r die globale Erweiterung von sevenload. Insbesondere hierf&#252;r suchen wir tatkr&#228;ftige Unterst&#252;tzung mit unseren [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monetization or Reach - Discussion [German] by Media-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sevenload plant Gang an die Börse und setzt auf Premium-Content</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/08/24/monetization-or-reach-discussion-german/comment-page-1/#comment-2424</link>
		<dc:creator>Media-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sevenload plant Gang an die Börse und setzt auf Premium-Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/08/24/monetization-or-reach-discussion-german/#comment-2424</guid>
		<description>[...] Chancen hat, mit Christiane zu Salm mal auf Augenh&#246;he in einem Vorstand &#252;ber Themen wie &#8220;Monetarisierung oder Reichweite&#8221; zu diskutieren. Die crossmedialen Potenziale des Burda-Medienportfolios d&#252;rften enorm sein. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chancen hat, mit Christiane zu Salm mal auf Augenh&#246;he in einem Vorstand &#252;ber Themen wie &#8220;Monetarisierung oder Reichweite&#8221; zu diskutieren. Die crossmedialen Potenziale des Burda-Medienportfolios d&#252;rften enorm sein. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Discussion: Monetization or Reach [English] by Media-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sevenload plant Gang an die Börse setzt auf Premium-Content</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/08/28/discussion-monetization-or-reach-english/comment-page-1/#comment-2423</link>
		<dc:creator>Media-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sevenload plant Gang an die Börse setzt auf Premium-Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/08/28/discussion-monetization-or-reach-english/#comment-2423</guid>
		<description>[...] Chancen hat mit Christiane zu Salm mal auf Augenh&#246;he in einem Vorstand &#252;ber Themen wie &#8220;Monetarisierung oder Reichweite&#8221; zu diskutieren. Die crossmedialen Potenziale des Burda-Medienportfolios d&#252;rften enorm sein. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chancen hat mit Christiane zu Salm mal auf Augenh&#246;he in einem Vorstand &#252;ber Themen wie &#8220;Monetarisierung oder Reichweite&#8221; zu diskutieren. Die crossmedialen Potenziale des Burda-Medienportfolios d&#252;rften enorm sein. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The YouTube Problem by Randall Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/03/the-youtube-problem/#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Hi Axel,

The “end of copyright” - another angle is that the internet will ultimately re-shape 100 years of copyright jurisprudence. The notion of copyright as a monopolistic economic right governed by exclusive licensing just doesn’t fly any longer. However, creators need to be rewarded for the fruits of the labour. Rather than trying to limit use and exploitation, copyright owners and creators should embrace the opportunities opened up by the internet; monetising all manner of uses rather than simply trying to limit who can use their copyright as they have done for  the last 100 years.  

Best,

Randall Harper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Axel,</p>
<p>The “end of copyright” - another angle is that the internet will ultimately re-shape 100 years of copyright jurisprudence. The notion of copyright as a monopolistic economic right governed by exclusive licensing just doesn’t fly any longer. However, creators need to be rewarded for the fruits of the labour. Rather than trying to limit use and exploitation, copyright owners and creators should embrace the opportunities opened up by the internet; monetising all manner of uses rather than simply trying to limit who can use their copyright as they have done for  the last 100 years.  </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Randall Harper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IPTV, Digital TV, and Web 2.0: Power to the Audience [English] by Randall Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/08/15/iptv-digital-tv-and-web-20-power-to-the-audience-english/comment-page-1/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/08/15/iptv-digital-tv-and-web-20-power-to-the-audience-english/#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>Hi Axel, 

Content providers have always felt they know best when it comes to deciding what their customers want to watch/listen, when and in what medium. Then along comes the internet, downloading, peer to peer; consumers have become empowered to take control of what and how they consume and, with that, we are seeing the disintegration of the old supply chain and markets, particularly in the music sector.

What a lot of “old” media/content companies failed to realize, or perhaps lost track of, until relatively recently is that the customer proposition or offer must be relevant to their customers; to satisfy the customer need or expectation. This is not a new concept – to be successful the products or services provided by any business have to be relevant to their customers. But now, with easy and inexpensive access to source from alternative channels, consumers in the entertainment and media space are demonstrably reinforcing this basic axiom. 

Some say that this realization, for the music industry, has come too late, but whilst this is proving difficult and challenging for “old” media/content companies, massive and exciting opportunities to monetise this changing dynamic are being created every day.

I agree with you that we are seeing fundamental structural change in the relationship between consumers/viewers and providers. However, whilst this is true, it remains crucial that relevance to the end customer must be achieved. The technological revolution we are experiencing is truly wondrous, but simply applying exciting new technology is only half of it. The other half is applying technology in such a manner that the product or service is relevant to, wanted by, the customer.

As the world becomes a smaller and smaller place, the need to accommodate vastly different consumer requirements, cultural differences, differing languages, and the full range of socio-economic and demographic differences, will necessitate a more sophisticated understanding of who the customer is and what turns him or her on. This is the challenge.

Best, 
Randall Harper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Axel, </p>
<p>Content providers have always felt they know best when it comes to deciding what their customers want to watch/listen, when and in what medium. Then along comes the internet, downloading, peer to peer; consumers have become empowered to take control of what and how they consume and, with that, we are seeing the disintegration of the old supply chain and markets, particularly in the music sector.</p>
<p>What a lot of “old” media/content companies failed to realize, or perhaps lost track of, until relatively recently is that the customer proposition or offer must be relevant to their customers; to satisfy the customer need or expectation. This is not a new concept – to be successful the products or services provided by any business have to be relevant to their customers. But now, with easy and inexpensive access to source from alternative channels, consumers in the entertainment and media space are demonstrably reinforcing this basic axiom. </p>
<p>Some say that this realization, for the music industry, has come too late, but whilst this is proving difficult and challenging for “old” media/content companies, massive and exciting opportunities to monetise this changing dynamic are being created every day.</p>
<p>I agree with you that we are seeing fundamental structural change in the relationship between consumers/viewers and providers. However, whilst this is true, it remains crucial that relevance to the end customer must be achieved. The technological revolution we are experiencing is truly wondrous, but simply applying exciting new technology is only half of it. The other half is applying technology in such a manner that the product or service is relevant to, wanted by, the customer.</p>
<p>As the world becomes a smaller and smaller place, the need to accommodate vastly different consumer requirements, cultural differences, differing languages, and the full range of socio-economic and demographic differences, will necessitate a more sophisticated understanding of who the customer is and what turns him or her on. This is the challenge.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Randall Harper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Viral Social Commerce by bev</title>
		<link>http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/12/viral-social-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.axelschmiegelow.com/2007/05/12/viral-social-commerce/#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.304 seconds -->
